You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
BMC Ecology image competition: the winning images
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-13-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon Harold, Yan Wong, Michel Baguette, Michael B Bonsall, Jean Clobert, Nick J Royle, Josef Settele |
Abstract |
BMC Ecology announces the winning entries in its inaugural Ecology Image Competition, open to anyone affiliated with a research institute. The competition, which received more than 200 entries from international researchers at all career levels and a wide variety of scientific disciplines, was looking for striking visual interpretations of ecological processes. In this Editorial, our academic Section Editors and guest judge Dr Yan Wong explain what they found most appealing about their chosen winning entries, and highlight a few of the outstanding images that didn't quite make it to the top prize. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
France | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
Scientists | 6 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Germany | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,169,424
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#274
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,644
of 209,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#7
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.