↓ Skip to main content

Science that "knows" and science that "asks"

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Science that "knows" and science that "asks"
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-9-128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre R Smeesters, Marie Deghorain, Andrew C Steer

Abstract

Clinician-researchers and experimental scientists do not speak the same language; they have different professional environments and different end-points in their research. This creates considerable problems of comprehension and communication, which constitute a major drawback in multidisciplinary work such as translational medicine. A stereotypic representation of both these worlds is presented as a starting point to encourage debate on this issue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Russia 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Other 4 17%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,266,089
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,228
of 3,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,776
of 119,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.