You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
German Francisella tularensis isolates from European brown hares (Lepus europaeus)reveal genetic and phenotypic diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-13-61 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolfgang Müller, Helmut Hotzel, Peter Otto, Axel Karger, Barbara Bettin, Herbert Bocklisch, Silke Braune, Ulrich Eskens, Stefan Hörmansdorfer, Regina Konrad, Anne Nesseler, Martin Peters, Martin Runge, Gernot Schmoock, Bernd-Andreas Schwarz, Reinhard Sting, Kerstin Myrtennäs, Edvin Karlsson, Mats Forsman, Herbert Tomaso |
| Abstract |
Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by Francisella tularensis that has been found in many different vertebrates. In Germany most human infections are caused by contact with infected European brown hares (Lepus europaeus). The aim of this study was to elucidate the epidemiology of tularemia in hares using phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of F. tularensis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,164,797
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,439
of 3,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,618
of 197,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#16
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.