You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Manipulating the sleep-wake cycle and circadian rhythms to improve clinical management of major depression
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-11-79 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ian B Hickie, Sharon L Naismith, Rébecca Robillard, Elizabeth M Scott, Daniel F Hermens |
Abstract |
Clinical psychiatry has always been limited by the lack of objective tests to substantiate diagnoses and a lack of specific treatments that target underlying pathophysiology. One area in which these twin failures has been most frustrating is major depression. Due to very considerable progress in the basic and clinical neurosciences of sleep-wake cycles and underlying circadian systems this situation is now rapidly changing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 10% |
Iceland | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 299 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 18% |
Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
Researcher | 37 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
Other | 50 | 16% |
Unknown | 64 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 20% |
Psychology | 41 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 31 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 5% |
Other | 58 | 19% |
Unknown | 75 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,427,799
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,003
of 4,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,720
of 211,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.