↓ Skip to main content

Effects of PEEP on regional ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of PEEP on regional ventilation-perfusion mismatch in the acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Critical Care, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04085-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bertrand Pavlovsky, Antonio Pesenti, Elena Spinelli, Gaetano Scaramuzzo, Ines Marongiu, Paola Tagliabue, Savino Spadaro, Giacomo Grasselli, Alain Mercat, Tommaso Mauri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 11 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 38%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,243,746
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,028
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,324
of 436,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#69
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.