You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characterisation of CD154+ T cells following ex vivo birch allergen stimulation defines a close relationship between T cell subsets in healthy volunteers
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Immunology, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2172-14-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen A Smith, Nicola J Gray, Elizabeth Cheek, Femi Saleh, Jo Lavender, Anthony J Frew, Florian Kern, Michael D Tarzi |
Abstract |
Allergic sensitisation has been ascribed to a dysregulated relationship between allergen-specific Th1, Th2 and regulatory T cells. We hypothesised that the relationship between these T cell subsets could be better defined using a short-term allergen stimulation system followed by direct analysis of CD154-positive T cells. Using peripheral blood samples from birch pollinosis patients and healthy non-atopic controls, we sought to explore the frequencies and phenotype of birch-stimulated CD154-positive T helper cells following ex vivo birch allergen stimulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
Researcher | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,857,742
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#93
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,691
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.