↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of nonunion and reoperation in patients with fractures of the tibia: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of nonunion and reoperation in patients with fractures of the tibia: an observational study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Fong, Victoria Truong, Clary J Foote, Brad Petrisor, Dale Williams, Bill Ristevski, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari

Abstract

Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long bone fracture and are prone to complications such as nonunion requiring reoperations to promote fracture healing. We aimed to determine the fracture characteristics associated with tibial fracture nonunion, and their predictive value on the need for reoperation. We further aimed to evaluate the predictive value of a previously-developed prognostic index of three fracture characteristics on nonunion and reoperation rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 36 25%
Unknown 33 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 45%
Engineering 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,635,391
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,218
of 4,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,217
of 210,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#55
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.