↓ Skip to main content

RECODE: Design and baseline results of a cluster randomized trial on cost-effectiveness of integrated COPD management in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RECODE: Design and baseline results of a cluster randomized trial on cost-effectiveness of integrated COPD management in primary care
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2466-13-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annemarije L Kruis, Melinde RS Boland, Catharina H Schoonvelde, Willem JJ Assendelft, Maureen PMH Rutten-van Mölken, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Niels H Chavannes

Abstract

Favorable effects of formal pulmonary rehabilitation in selected moderate to severe COPD patients are well established. Few data are available on the effects and costs of integrated disease management (IDM) programs on quality of care and health status of COPD patients in primary care, representing a much larger group of COPD patients. Therefore, the RECODE trial assesses the long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of IDM in primary care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Psychology 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 34 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2013.
All research outputs
#17,682,134
of 22,701,287 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,252
of 1,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,500
of 197,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,701,287 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.