You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of the information provided by electronic health records data and a population health survey to estimate prevalence of selected health conditions and multimorbidity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-251 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Concepción Violán, Quintí Foguet-Boreu, Eduardo Hermosilla-Pérez, Jose M Valderas, Bonaventura Bolíbar, Mireia Fàbregas-Escurriola, Pilar Brugulat-Guiteras, Miguel Ángel Muñoz-Pérez |
| Abstract |
Health surveys (HS) are a well-established methodology for measuring the health status of a population. The relative merit of using information based on HS versus electronic health records (EHR) to measure multimorbidity has not been established. Our study had two objectives: 1) to measure and compare the prevalence and distribution of multimorbidity in HS and EHR data, and 2) to test specific hypotheses about potential differences between HS and EHR reporting of diseases with a symptoms-based diagnosis and those requiring diagnostic testing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 239 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 48 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,115,857
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,451
of 14,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,096
of 197,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#143
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.