↓ Skip to main content

Applying systems biology methods to the study of human physiology in extreme environments

Overview of attention for article published in Extreme Physiology & Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying systems biology methods to the study of human physiology in extreme environments
Published in
Extreme Physiology & Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2046-7648-2-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay M Edwards, Ines Thiele

Abstract

Systems biology is defined in this review as 'an iterative process of computational model building and experimental model revision with the aim of understanding or simulating complex biological systems'. We propose that, in practice, systems biology rests on three pillars: computation, the omics disciplines and repeated experimental perturbation of the system of interest. The number of ethical and physiologically relevant perturbations that can be used in experiments on healthy humans is extremely limited and principally comprises exercise, nutrition, infusions (e.g. Intralipid), some drugs and altered environment. Thus, we argue that systems biology and environmental physiology are natural symbionts for those interested in a system-level understanding of human biology. However, despite excellent progress in high-altitude genetics and several proteomics studies, systems biology research into human adaptation to extreme environments is in its infancy. A brief description and overview of systems biology in its current guise is given, followed by a mini review of computational methods used for modelling biological systems. Special attention is given to high-altitude research, metabolic network reconstruction and constraint-based modelling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
India 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 85 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Sports and Recreations 8 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2013.
All research outputs
#13,885,035
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#75
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,101
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extreme Physiology & Medicine
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.