↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of long-term endophthalmitis developing after intraocular lens implantation in children: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of long-term endophthalmitis developing after intraocular lens implantation in children: a retrospective study
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12886-022-02519-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chen Zou, Ting Zhang, Xin Wang, Hong Zhuang, Rui Jiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#19,569,977
of 24,071,812 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#1,571
of 2,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,940
of 422,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#65
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,071,812 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.