You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fucoidan-derived carbon dots against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm and infected dentinal tubules for the treatment of persistent endodontic infections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01501-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shang Tang, Hui Zhang, Li Mei, Keke Dou, Yuying Jiang, Zhanyi Sun, Shuai Wang, Mohamed Sayed Hasanin, Jing Deng, Qihui Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 72% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,500,955
of 25,124,631 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#127
of 1,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,518
of 427,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#8
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,124,631 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.