↓ Skip to main content

Diaphragm dysfunction as a potential determinant of dyspnea on exertion in patients 1 year after COVID-19-related ARDS

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
76 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diaphragm dysfunction as a potential determinant of dyspnea on exertion in patients 1 year after COVID-19-related ARDS
Published in
Respiratory Research, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12931-022-02100-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Spiesshoefer, Janina Friedrich, Binaya Regmi, Jonathan Geppert, Benedikt Jörn, Alexander Kersten, Alberto Giannoni, Matthias Boentert, Gernot Marx, Nikolaus Marx, Ayham Daher, Michael Dreher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 22 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 22 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#871,612
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#58
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,565
of 436,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.