You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial testing virtual tobacco treatment in oncology practices [Smokefree Support Study 2.0]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-13631-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brett M. Goshe, Autumn W. Rasmussen, Lynne I. Wagner, JoRean D. Sicks, Ilana F. Gareen, Ruth C. Carlos, Benjamin A. Herman, Angela Wangari Walter, Susan Regan, Douglas E. Levy, Irene Mahon, Alona Muzikansky, Jordan M. Neil, Michelle Lui, Deepika Dilip, Laura Malloy, Irina Gonzalez, Lucy Finkelstein-Fox, Caitlin McCann, Elissa Perez, Jamie S. Ostroff, Elyse R. Park |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,117,116
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,166
of 14,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,137
of 434,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#188
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.