You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protective role of small extracellular vesicles derived from HUVECs treated with AGEs in diabetic vascular calcification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01529-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bei Guo, Su-Kang Shan, Feng Xu, Xiao Lin, Fu-Xing-zi Li, Yi Wang, Qiu-Shuang Xu, Ming-Hui Zheng, Li-Min Lei, Chang-Chun Li, Zhi-Ang Zhou, Muhammad Hasnain Ehsan Ullah, Feng Wu, Xiao-Bo Liao, Ling-Qing Yuan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,985,455
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#466
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,797
of 433,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#29
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.