You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intervention, individual, and contextual determinants to high adherence to structured family-centered rounds: a national multi-site mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-022-00322-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew J. Knighton, Ellen J. Bass, Elease J. McLaurin, Michele Anderson, Jennifer D. Baird, Sharon Cray, Lauren Destino, Alisa Khan, Isabella Liss, Peggy Markle, Jennifer K. O’Toole, Aarti Patel, Rajendu Srivastava, Christopher P. Landrigan, Nancy D. Spector, Shilpa J. Patel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,475,442
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#284
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,170
of 433,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#31
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.