You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Radiodynamic therapy with CsI(na)@MgO nanoparticles and 5-aminolevulinic acid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01537-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fangchao Jiang, Chaebin Lee, Weizhong Zhang, Wen Jiang, Zhengwei Cao, Harrison Byron Chong, Wei Yang, Shuyue Zhan, Jianwen Li, Yong Teng, Zibo Li, Jin Xie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,286,049
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#508
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,871
of 433,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#38
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.