↓ Skip to main content

An introduction to effective use of enrichment analysis software

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An introduction to effective use of enrichment analysis software
Published in
Human Genomics, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1479-7364-4-3-202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Tipney, Lawrence Hunter

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 240 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 22%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 47 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 28%
Computer Science 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 55 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#224
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,855
of 178,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them