You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
(Re)Conceptualising ‘good’ proxy decision-making for research: the implications for proxy consent decision quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00809-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Shepherd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 54% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 46% |
| Scientists | 18 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,452,674
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#107
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,987
of 436,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.