You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Legal concerns in health-related artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-01939-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Da Silva, Tanya Horsley, Devin Singh, Emily Da Silva, Valentina Ly, Bryan Thomas, Ryan C. Daniel, Karni A. Chagal-Feferkorn, Samantha Iantomasi, Kelli White, Arianne Kent, Colleen M. Flood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 71% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,388,188
of 24,970,913 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,070
of 2,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,922
of 434,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#19
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,970,913 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.