You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Explaining socioeconomic inequality in cervical cancer screening uptake in Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-13750-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gowokani Chijere Chirwa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malawi | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,110,481
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,179
of 15,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,352
of 434,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#219
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.