↓ Skip to main content

Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position
Published in
Critical Care, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04087-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Shi, Soufia Ayed, Francesca Moretto, Danila Azzolina, Nello De Vita, Francesco Gavelli, Simone Carelli, Arthur Pavot, Christopher Lai, Xavier Monnet, Jean-Louis Teboul

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,583,998
of 25,528,120 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,389
of 6,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,891
of 435,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#32
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,528,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.