You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position
Critical Care, July 2022
Rui Shi, Soufia Ayed, Francesca Moretto, Danila Azzolina, Nello De Vita, Francesco Gavelli, Simone Carelli, Arthur Pavot, Christopher Lai, Xavier Monnet, Jean-Louis Teboul
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||12||71%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||24%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||7||33%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||5%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,784,266 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
of 6,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 436,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,784,266 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.