You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital: a prospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-022-00626-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ting Zhou, Jianjun Wang, Chenxi Zhang, Bin Zhang, Haiming Guo, Bo Yang, Qing Li, Jingyi Ge, Yi Li, Guangyu Niu, Hua Gao, Hongying Jiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 28% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,700,710
of 25,191,684 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#136
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,078
of 427,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,191,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.