↓ Skip to main content

CMIC: an efficient quality score compressor with random access functionality

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CMIC: an efficient quality score compressor with random access functionality
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12859-022-04837-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hansen Chen, Jianhua Chen, Zhiwen Lu, Rongshu Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,145,102
of 24,185,663 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,119
of 7,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,803
of 420,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#59
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,185,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.