You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Different dietary starch patterns in low-protein diets: effect on nitrogen efficiency, nutrient metabolism, and intestinal flora in growing pigs
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, June 2022
Junyan Zhou, Lu Wang, Lijie Yang, Guangxin Yang, Xiangfang Zeng, Shiyan Qiao
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||50%|
|Members of the public||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||22%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||22%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||11%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 441,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.