You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethnographic study of ICT-supported collaborative work routines in general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-10-348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Swinglehurst, Trisha Greenhalgh, Michelle Myall, Jill Russell |
| Abstract |
Health informatics research has traditionally been dominated by experimental and quasi-experimental designs. An emerging area of study in organisational sociology is routinisation (how collaborative work practices become business-as-usual). There is growing interest in the use of ethnography and other in-depth qualitative approaches to explore how collaborative work routines are enacted and develop over time, and how electronic patient records (EPRs) are used to support collaborative work practices within organisations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 19% |
| Researcher | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 16 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2013.
All research outputs
#19,334,581
of 23,934,148 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,833
of 8,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,777
of 186,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#29
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.