You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Traditional knowledge of wild edible plants used in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal): a comparative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-3-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana, Javier Tardío, Emilio Blanco, Ana Maria Carvalho, Juan José Lastra, Elia San Miguel, Ramón Morales |
| Abstract |
We compare traditional knowledge and use of wild edible plants in six rural regions of the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula as follows: Campoo, Picos de Europa, Piloña, Sanabria and Caurel in Spain and Parque Natural de Montesinho in Portugal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Oman | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 265 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 15% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 23% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 66 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,271,743
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#179
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,476
of 83,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.