↓ Skip to main content

Severe inflammatory disease activity 14 months after cessation of Natalizumab in a patient with Leber’s optic neuropathy and multiple sclerosis – a case report

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Severe inflammatory disease activity 14 months after cessation of Natalizumab in a patient with Leber’s optic neuropathy and multiple sclerosis – a case report
Published in
BMC Neurology, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12883-016-0720-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trygve Holmøy, Antonie G. Beiske, Svetozar Zarnovicky, Aija Zuleron Myro, Egil Røsjø, Emilia Kerty

Abstract

Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) co-occuring with multiple sclerosis-like disease (LHON-MS) is suggested to be a separate disease entity denoted Harding's disease. Little is known about the response to initiation and discontinuation of potent immunomodulatory treatment in LHON-MS. We describe a LHON-MS patient with 27 years disease duration who developed severe disease activity peaking 14 months after discontinuation of natalizumab, with extensive new inflammatory lesions throughout the brain and in the spinal cord resembling immune inflammatory reconstitution syndrome. She had previously been clinically and radiologically stable on natalizumab treatment for 6 years, and before that only experienced subtle clinical activity during 9 years on interferon beta1a. This is the first report on severe exacerbation of inflammatory disease activity after discontinuation of natalizumab in LHON-MS, and suggests that late rebound activity can occur in these patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Neuroscience 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,194,807
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#496
of 2,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,323
of 316,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#21
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.