You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Erratum to: Review and evaluation of the methodological quality of the existing guidelines and recommendations for inherited neurometabolic disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-016-0431-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Cassis, Elisenda Cortès-Saladelafont, Marta Molero-Luis, Delia Yubero, Maria Julieta González, Aida Ormazábal, Carme Fons, Cristina Jou, Cristina Sierra, Esperanza Castejon Ponce, Federico Ramos, Judith Armstrong, M. Mar O’Callaghan, Mercedes Casado, Raquel Montero, Silvia Meavilla-Olivas, Rafael Artuch, Ivo Barić, Franco Bartoloni, Cinzia Maria Bellettato, Fedele Bonifazi, Adriana Ceci, Ljerka Cvitanović-Šojat, Christine I. Dali, Francesca D’Avanzo, Ksenija Fumic, Viviana Giannuzzi, Christina Lampe, Maurizio Scarpa, Ángels Garcia-Cazorla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,250,254
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,339
of 2,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,217
of 311,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.