You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulation-based clinical assessment identifies threshold competence to practise physiotherapy in Australia: a crossover trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-022-00215-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penny Moss, Anton Barnett-Harris, Darren Lee, Kriti Gupta, Shane Pritchard, Natalie Sievers, Maxine Te, Felicity Blackstock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Librarian | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,521,947
of 24,162,843 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#220
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,000
of 420,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#11
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,162,843 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.