You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in transcriptome of native nasal epithelium expressing F508del-CFTR and intersecting data from comparable studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-14-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luka A Clarke, Lisete Sousa, Celeste Barreto, Margarida D Amaral |
| Abstract |
Microarray studies related to cystic fibrosis (CF) airway gene expression have gone some way in clarifying the complex molecular background of CF lung diseases, but have made little progress in defining a robust "molecular signature" associated with mutant CFTR expression. Disparate methodological and statistical analyses complicate comparisons between independent studies of the CF transcriptome, and although each study may be valid in isolation, the conclusions reached differ widely. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 24% |
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,055
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,222
of 210,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#30
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.