You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Methods for capturing and analyzing adaptations: implications for implementation research
Implementation Science, July 2022
Jodi Summers Holtrop, Dennis Gurfinkel, Andrea Nederveld, Phoutdavone Phimphasone-Brady, Patrick Hosokawa, Claude Rubinson, Jeanette A. Waxmonsky, Bethany M. Kwan
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||17||44%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||5%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||5%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||3||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||12%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||4||15%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||12%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,522,750 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 422,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,522,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.