↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide DNA methylation signature predict clinical benefit of bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide DNA methylation signature predict clinical benefit of bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12885-022-09918-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Butuo Li, Chao Jiang, Yiyue Xu, Xinyu Fan, Linlin Yang, Bing Zou, Bingjie Fan, Linlin Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#14,369,287
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#3,405
of 8,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,072
of 431,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#55
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.