You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using decision analysis to support implementation planning in research and practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-022-00330-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Natalie Riva Smith, Kathleen E. Knocke, Kristen Hassmiller Lich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,115,772
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#219
of 479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,368
of 420,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.