↓ Skip to main content

Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie J. King, Adrienne Stevens, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Chris Kamel, Chantelle Garritty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 22 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Computer Science 5 8%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,565,641
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,789
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,437
of 431,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#52
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.