↓ Skip to main content

Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparins for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, July 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12959-022-00399-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tarinee Rungjirajittranon, Weerapat Owattanapanich, Yingyong Chinthammitr, Theera Ruchutrakool, Bundarika Suwanawiboon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,703,203
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#187
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,196
of 433,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.