You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Relationship between bite size per mouthful and dental arch size in healthy subjects
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Physiological Sciences, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12576-018-0630-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kouichi Shiozawa, Yasumasa Mototani, Kenji Suita, Aiko Ito, Naoya Kawamura, Yuka Yagisawa, Ichiro Matsuo, Yoshio Hayakawa, Megumi Nariyama, Daisuke Umeki, Yasutake Saeki, Yoshiki Ohnuki, Satoshi Okumura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 20% |
Psychology | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,272,032
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#163
of 321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,585
of 333,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Physiological Sciences
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them