You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Empiric treatment of patients with sepsis and septic shock and place in therapy of cefiderocol: a systematic review and expert opinion statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s44158-022-00062-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Cortegiani, Giulia Ingoglia, Mariachiara Ippolito, Massimo Girardis, Marco Falcone, Federico Pea, Francesco Pugliese, Stefania Stefani, Pierluigi Viale, Antonino Giarratano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 36% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,453,982
of 23,979,951 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#26
of 79 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,660
of 418,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.