↓ Skip to main content

Impact of glycemic control with sitagliptin on the 2-year progression of arterial stiffness: a sub-analysis of the PROLOGUE study

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiovascular Diabetology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of glycemic control with sitagliptin on the 2-year progression of arterial stiffness: a sub-analysis of the PROLOGUE study
Published in
Cardiovascular Diabetology, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12933-016-0472-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirofumi Tomiyama, Takashi Miwa, Kenshi Kan, Munehide Matsuhisa, Haruo Kamiya, Mamoru Nanasato, Tomoki Kitano, Hiroaki Sano, Jun Ohno, Masato Iida, Masataka Sata, Hirotsugu Yamada, Koji Maemura, Atsushi Tanaka, Toyoaki Murohara, Koichi Node

Abstract

No conclusive evidence has been obtained yet on the significance of the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4 inhibitor) treatment on the arterial stiffness in clinical settings. In addition, the effects of good glycemic control on the arterial stiffness have also not been clarified yet. As a sub-analysis of the PROLOGUE study, we examined the effect of a DPP-4 inhibitor (sitagliptin) on the 2-year progression of the arterial stiffness and also to determine the effect of good glycemic control on the rate of progression of the arterial stiffness. In the PROLOGUE study, the study participants were either allocated to add-on sitagliptin treatment or to continued treatment with conventional anti-diabetic agents. Among the 463 participants of the PROLOGUE study, we succeeded in measuring the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) at least two times during the 2-year study period in 96 subjects. The changes in the baPWV during the study period were similar between the both groups (i.e., with/without staglipitin), overall. On the other hand, when the study subjects were divided into two groups according to the glycemic control status during the study period {good glycemic control group (GC) = hemoglobin (Hb)A1c <7.0 at both 12 and 24 months after the treatment randomization; poor glycemic control group (PC) = HbA1c ≥7.0 at either 12 months, 24 months, or both}, the 2-year increase of the baPWV was marginally significantly larger in the PC group (144 ± 235 cm/s) as compared to that the GC group (-10 ± 282 cm/s) (p = 0.036). While the present study could not confirm the beneficial effect of sitagliptin per se on the arterial stiffness, the results suggested that good glycemic control appears to be beneficial for delaying the annual progression of the arterial stiffness. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000004490.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 17 31%