You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Virtual screening of Indonesian herbal compounds as COVID-19 supportive therapy: machine learning and pharmacophore modeling approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12906-022-03686-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Erlina, Rafika Indah Paramita, Wisnu Ananta Kusuma, Fadilah Fadilah, Aryo Tedjo, Irandi Putra Pratomo, Nabila Sekar Ramadhanti, Ahmad Kamal Nasution, Fadhlal Khaliq Surado, Aries Fitriawan, Khaerunissa Anbar Istiadi, Arry Yanuar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 20 | 22% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 92% |
| Scientists | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 155 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 68 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 18 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 72 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#709,054
of 25,845,895 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#95
of 3,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,030
of 434,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.