↓ Skip to main content

Are progressive shoulder exercises feasible in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tear arthropathy?

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are progressive shoulder exercises feasible in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis or rotator cuff tear arthropathy?
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40814-022-01127-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josefine Beck Larsen, Helle Kvistgaard Østergaard, Theis Muncholm Thillemann, Thomas Falstie-Jensen, Lisa Cecilie Urup Reimer, Sidsel Noe, Steen Lund Jensen, Inger Mechlenburg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,232,510
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#110
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,075
of 423,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#3
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.