You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geographic distribution of the V1016G knockdown resistance mutation in Aedes albopictus: a warning bell for Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-022-05407-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Verena Pichler, Beniamino Caputo, Vera Valadas, Martina Micocci, Cintia Horvath, Chiara Virgillito, Mustafa Akiner, Georgios Balatsos, Christelle Bender, Gilles Besnard, Daniel Bravo-Barriga, Rubén Bueno-Mari, Francisco Collantes, Sarah Delacour-Estrella, Enkelejda Dikolli, Elena Falcuta, Eleonora Flacio, Ana L. García-Pérez, Katja Kalan, Mihaela Kavran, Gregory L’Ambert, Riccardo P. Lia, Eduardo Marabuto, Raquel Medialdea, Rosario Melero-Alcibar, Antonios Michaelakis, Andrei Mihalca, Ognyan Mikov, Miguel A. Miranda, Pie Müller, Domenico Otranto, Igor Pajovic, Dusan Petric, Maria Teresa Rebelo, Vincent Robert, Elton Rogozi, Ana Tello, Toni Zitko, Francis Schaffner, Joao Pinto, Alessandra della Torre |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 12% |
| United States | 9 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 58% |
| Scientists | 25 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#339,432
of 25,369,304 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#32
of 5,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,140
of 426,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#2
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,369,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.