You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mu heavy chain disease with MYD88 L265P mutation: an unusual manifestation of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13000-022-01244-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vandana Baloda, Sarah E. Wheeler, David L. Murray, Mindy C. Kohlhagen, Jeffrey A. Vos, Svetlana A. Yatsenko, Mounzer E. Agha, Miroslav Djokic, Steven H. Swerdlow, Nathanael G. Bailey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,096,023
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#132
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,257
of 418,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.