You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mucus interaction to improve gastrointestinal retention and pharmacokinetics of orally administered nano-drug delivery systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01539-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deepak A. Subramanian, Robert Langer, Giovanni Traverso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 12% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#13,614,283
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#424
of 1,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,269
of 432,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#20
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,449 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.