↓ Skip to main content

Practical guidance for planning resources required to support publicly-funded adaptive clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Practical guidance for planning resources required to support publicly-funded adaptive clinical trials
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12916-022-02445-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. S. Wason, Munyaradzi Dimairo, Katie Biggs, Sarah Bowden, Julia Brown, Laura Flight, Jamie Hall, Thomas Jaki, Rachel Lowe, Philip Pallmann, Mark A. Pilling, Claire Snowdon, Matthew R. Sydes, Sofía S. Villar, Christopher J. Weir, Nina Wilson, Christina Yap, Helen Hancock, Rebecca Maier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 13%
Mathematics 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,547,058
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,088
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,772
of 430,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#18
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.