You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Practical guidance for planning resources required to support publicly-funded adaptive clinical trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12916-022-02445-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James M. S. Wason, Munyaradzi Dimairo, Katie Biggs, Sarah Bowden, Julia Brown, Laura Flight, Jamie Hall, Thomas Jaki, Rachel Lowe, Philip Pallmann, Mark A. Pilling, Claire Snowdon, Matthew R. Sydes, Sofía S. Villar, Christopher J. Weir, Nina Wilson, Christina Yap, Helen Hancock, Rebecca Maier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 15 | 48% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
Scientists | 7 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,857,441
of 25,330,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,317
of 3,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,245
of 425,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#22
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,330,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.