↓ Skip to main content

Recognition of face-name associations after errorless and errorful learning: an fMRI study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recognition of face-name associations after errorless and errorful learning: an fMRI study
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-14-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anke Hammer, Claus Tempelmann, Thomas F Münte

Abstract

Errorless learning has advantages over errorful learning. The erroneous items produced during errorful learning compete with correct items at retrieval resulting in decreased memory performance. This interference is associated with an increased demand on executive monitoring processes. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to contrast errorless and errorful learning. Learning mode was manipulated by the number of distractors during learning of face-name associations: in errorless learning only the correct name was introduced. During errorful learning either one incorrect name or two incorrect names were additionally introduced in order to modulate the interference in recognition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Engineering 4 9%
Computer Science 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 6 14%