You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Usefulness of the d-dimer to albumin ratio for risk assessment in patients with acute variceal bleeding at the emergency department: retrospective observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12873-022-00696-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jun Seok Seo, Yongwon Kim, Yoonsuk Lee, Ho Young Chung, Tae Youn Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,818,458
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#243
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,118
of 432,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.