↓ Skip to main content

Permissive hypotension does not reduce regional organ perfusion compared to normotensive resuscitation: animal study with fluorescent microspheres

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Emergency Surgery, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Permissive hypotension does not reduce regional organ perfusion compared to normotensive resuscitation: animal study with fluorescent microspheres
Published in
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1749-7922-7-s1-s9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno M Schmidt, Joao B Rezende-Neto, Marcus V Andrade, Philippe C Winter, Mario G Carvalho, Thiago A Lisboa, Sandro B Rizoli, Jose Renan Cunha-Melo

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate regional organ perfusion acutely following uncontrolled hemorrhage in an animal model that simulates a penetrating vascular injury and accounts for prehospital times in urban trauma. We set forth to determine if hypotensive resuscitation (permissive hypotension) would result in equivalent organ perfusion compared to normotensive resuscitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 70%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,788,583
of 23,978,545 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#401
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,349
of 171,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,545 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.