You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clustering of diet- and activity-related parenting practices: cross-sectional findings of the INPACT study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-10-36 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerda Rodenburg, Anke Oenema, Stef PJ Kremers, Dike van de Mheen |
| Abstract |
Various diet- and activity-related parenting practices are positive determinants of child dietary and activity behaviour, including home availability, parental modelling and parental policies. There is evidence that parenting practices cluster within the dietary domain and within the activity domain. This study explores whether diet- and activity-related parenting practices cluster across the dietary and activity domain. Also examined is whether the clusters are related to child and parental background characteristics. Finally, to indicate the relevance of the clusters in influencing child dietary and activity behaviour, we examined whether clusters of parenting practices are related to these behaviours. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,761,051
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#623
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,811
of 210,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.