↓ Skip to main content

What the hyena's laugh tells: Sex, age, dominance and individual signature in the giggling call of Crocuta crocuta

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
24 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What the hyena's laugh tells: Sex, age, dominance and individual signature in the giggling call of Crocuta crocuta
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-10-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Mathevon, Aaron Koralek, Mary Weldele, Stephen E Glickman, Frédéric E Theunissen

Abstract

Among mammals living in social groups, individuals form communication networks where they signal their identity and social status, facilitating social interaction. In spite of its importance for understanding of mammalian societies, the coding of individual-related information in the vocal signals of non-primate mammals has been relatively neglected. The present study focuses on the spotted hyena Crocuta crocuta, a social carnivore known for its complex female-dominated society. We investigate if and how the well-known hyena's laugh, also known as the giggle call, encodes information about the emitter.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 241 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Researcher 53 20%
Student > Master 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Other 13 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 37 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 57%
Environmental Science 32 12%
Psychology 8 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 44 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#933,050
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#194
of 3,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,654
of 104,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.